Other blogs of mine:
“I’m not a Cracker, dammit! I’m a Saltine American!”
Now that I’ve gotten that bad joke out of the way: There is a fair amount of heated discussion going on around US culture concerning the subject of racism. Hearing a young black man refer to me one day (granted: it was at Walmart) as a “Cracker” brought the discussion to my mind.
I wonder if the young man in question realizes the irony in his use of that term as a pejorative considering the pejorative words that have been excised from our speech (rightly so in my opinion) to temper real or perceived white on black racism.
Further, I wonder if the young man even understands the real meaning of the term “Cracker.”
The first thing that happens when a nation is born is an imaginary line is drawn around the territory it occupies. What’s inside that boundary becomes part of that nation and whatever or whoever is outside that boundary is considered “foreign.”
The first responsibility of a government is to defend that border and keep outsiders out. Depending on the country in question some have more lax rules about immigration than others.
The United States of America probably has some of the most lax immigration rules in the world and there is a big difference between being an immigrant and being an illegal immigrant. Key word in that phrase is “illegal.”
So once again political correctness has shaken its fist angrily and gotten its way. The Battle Flag of North Carolina which has been mistakenly identified as the flag of the Confederacy and has been taken down in South Carolina having been tarred by the left as being a symbol of racism.
Given that there are racist organizations that have used the flag of the United States of America as a symbol of their twisted agenda, not to mention the Bible, the flag commonly used as a symbol of Christian churches and lots of other symbols should we ban those as well?
For a lot of Southerners the flag associated with the Confederacy is a symbol of Southern Pride no matter that both whites and blacks from the south see it that way, we must in the name of Political Correctness and division censor that symbol.
Where do we go from there?
Since my sixteenth birthday (boy was that a long time ago) I have had an on again off again relationship with the National Rifle Association. I can’t bring myself to totally 100% agree with their positions on firearm ownership but I find myself wanting to support an organization that is out to prevent the outlawing of private firearm ownership for a whole host of reasons.
First off our founding fathers felt the private ownership of firearms was such an important right that it was second after the much more important right to free speech. I find that placement rather significant.
Apparently the Supreme Court agrees with the importance of this amendment having recently validated the right of US citizens to keep and bear arms. In my opinion there is another side to this coin that gets lost in the discussion of private firearm ownership.
A right comes with it responsibility. In my opinion a right is not the same thing as an entitlement.
Ah.. the power of the internet… now anybody can have a pulpit to preach from and a megaphone to do it with. Obviously if that were not the case this blog would not exist. Anybody who can afford to have a hosted site or have the ability to get space on any one of the free web sites can say anything and everything they want to say. I love it. I’m not being sarcastic, I really love it. Used properly it is a great way to facilitate the free exchange of ideas.
There is a dark side however and this curmudgeon is great for spotting the downside. Whether by email or via a blog or on Twitter people have been known to publish unsubstantiated fact, innuendo, rumor or whatever without checking their facts first. Worse yet there are sites and blogs out there that publish articles to the internet that take fact and embellish on it to the point of drowning out the fact to support an agenda or worse.
Careers have been ruined by this bad behavior and it gets worse. Start photo-shopping images and you can ruin lives. Here is a classic example (offsite link) of what I’m talking about and this is far from the only time it has happened.
Tales told on Facebook about people ruin lives as well. There are a number of articles that have been written by Time Magazine, Wall Street Journal and others that spell out just how easily you can ruin your own reputation saying nothing about how much damage you can cause to others.
Another facet of this downside is the reporting of so called fact about news stories. I hate to beat this dead horse any more. In the wake of the Ferguson shootings there were all sorts of people on Twitter claiming to “know for a fact <insert statement>” on both sides of the issue. In my opinion there should not have been any sides but there were lots of folks with agendas stirring up sentiment in one direction or the other.
Just because you see something on Twitter doesn’t make it so. There have been lots of wild claims made on Twitter that later turned out to be false.
What to do: Number one, think critically. If something sounds a little to pat or extreme or fantastic it probably is. Number two: check facts for yourself. Critical thinking and doing your own homework will keep you from being led down the rosey path of someone else’s agenda.
In every story there are multiple views of what happened that are shaped by the lenses people’s instinctive prejudices based on their upbringing, life’s experiences and other factors. Someone who had a friend or a relative that went to jail may not like the police very much. Something happens involving a police officer and automatically the police officer is guilty of a crime.
I will not go on record saying there aren’t bad police officers. Police officers represent a cross section of society and they bring their own baggage to the table. I tend to be pro law enforcement but I have certainly met a few police officers over the years that made me think “what a jerk!” Case in point was a police officer sitting in a diner having his lunch and I overheard him say “there’s three kinds of people in this world, suspects, victims and law enforcement.” Not exactly a sterling moment in public relations for that police department.
Those aren’t the police officers I think about. I think of all the very dedicated to public service police officers I’ve known personally over the years that would do whatever they could for you if needed. I’m talking about the one police officer I interacted that got down on his belly in uniform because his long arms could reach the puppy that had fallen into a storm drain. He could have waited for animal control, but the young girl who’s puppy it was tugged on his heart strings.
There have been other news events where social media has caused disinformation to circulate frighteningly quick. Interesting excersize is to Google for “superstorm Sandy disinformation.” There was loads of disinformation about Sandy released ranging from the downright silly to tales of conspiracies linking Sandy to any number of supposedly powerful organizations with world domination in mind. Embarrassing for me as a practicing Christian was the Christian group that put out on a website an article blaming gays for the wrath of Superstorm Sandy.
The internet makes a great way to have your own bullhorn and pulpit. It also makes for an excellent bullying tool and a source for deceit.
Be careful what you believe.
This was the question posed by “Good Morning America” this morning on Twitter. Before I get into my opinion on this let me define what I consider to be “spanking.”
First what it is not. A spanking should not use a switch, belt, paddle, wooden spoon or other implement in its application. A spanking in my book is the firm application of one’s hand to the gluteous maximus of the child in question.
I grew up getting spanked for transgressions, not just by my parents but the town I grew up in if you messed up royally enough it could be a case where you got a spanking on the spot by the closest adult and then another one when you got home.
A spanking should never be applied in a blind rage. It should be applied calmly and when the child understands what they are being spanked for. The spanking should not be excessive. Ten slaps on the butt should suffice for just about any offense I can think of.
I can just hear someone out there whining “oh… but you’ll just hurt the child’s psyche.” Bull****.
Raising children should be a balancing act between just enough permissiveness to allow a child to grow into their own and limits on just what avenues they are allowed to explore. Some of those limits should be pretty obvious, such as not stealing from the local convenience store, what time to be home, do your chores and homework and so on.
So, do I believe in spanking? Yes. Can it be excessive? Yes. The object to a spanking is to demonstrate to children there are consequences to their actions if they misbehave. Not to injure the child. This is just common sense which I realize is not so common any more.
Let me start by reiterating that in my honest opinion the loss of life no matter the circumstances of a human being is a huge loss for all of us. That human being was a son or daughter to someone and there is no greater pain than the loss of a child for a parent.
That said, let me examine something for a moment.
It would seem to me that the mainstream media went on a witch hunt right after the Ferguson shooting. Any news item that could smear the officer involved in the shooting was aired or in print. The Twitter-sphere went nuts with every assumption the officer was guilty.
The forensic evidence was reviewed recently and the resuts are interesting to say the least.
The first item that caught my attention was the fact the autopsy report revealed that Michael Brown did not have his hands raised in surrender at all. The bullet entered the back of his arm and came out the underside indicating his hands could NOT have been raised in surrender. The second piece of evidence showed Michael’s hand was in contact with the firearm when it was discharged.
Those two pieces of evidence change the entire scenario as depicted in the press and as well told by word of mouth by race baiters involved on the periphery.
What saddens me is the escalating violence that followed. Businesses were ransacked in the looting and rioting that followed. Now you have more victims in the violence in the form of small business owners going out of business and losing their livelyhoods not to mention that was done to the communities themselves.
I write this article not to condemn Michael Brown himself. As I said in the beginning of this post any loss of life is tragic. I offer my condolences to the family of Michael Brown for his loss.
If anything good can come out of his loss there are lessons to be learned here. Our press reporting has become flawed. Instead of just reporting the news there are editorial adgendas that get in the way. The justice system does work, maybe not the way we’d like it to but it works. Don’t buy into the race baiting, those that participate have their own personal adgendas and they are not always in line with what is best for our society.
When I first became a voter way back when I just turned 18 I ended up going back home (only a mile) and getting my voter registration card out of the middle drawer of my desk. I had failed to put it in my wallet as I had been instructed when I registered in the first place. My bad.
Returning to the poll I presented my Voter Registration Card to the clerk in the A-H line and she checked a physical representation of the voter registeration rolls for my name as printed on the card. Finding my name she turned the register around and asked me to sign next to my name. One Voter. One Vote. I was then presented with a card that I gave over to the gentleman supervising the voting machines, curtains were drawn and I cast my first ever votes.
What was wrong with that process?
There are some that allege that this is somehow racist. That it unfairly targets minorities and the poor. How is that? There is nothing intrinsic that disallows anyone from casting their ballot if they have the legal right to do so. Voter ID cards are a part of that process.
In this day and age of identity theft having a government issued ID card presented along with the Voter Registration ID strengthens that system. Since every voter ID card I’ve ever seen looks like something from a Cracker Jack box having a picture ID pin down who you are is a good thing.
So what’s the issue, really? I would propose that the only folks that should be opposing voter ID requirements are those who stand to gain from having undocumented and/or unregistered voters casting votes.
Whatever happened in Ferguson MO is a crying shame. A young man died in a hail of bullets and a loss of life is a loss of life no matter who it is. That was someone’s son and being the father of a son myself I can certainly commiserate with the family over this loss. The majority of whoever reads this blog will have to admit they weren’t there, they don’t know what really happened. The only folks that know what happened were the victim, the police that were on-scene and any onlookers that happened to be there.
Thanks to our wonderful press the real story has become lost in a myriad of grandstanding, hand wringing and sensationalism. All we really know is a police officer fired his service weapon at Michael Brown and he died of his wounds. Immediately the press makes hay over the fact that the officer was white and Michael Brown was black.
During the subsequent violence a black police officer shot a white young man. Where’s the press on that one?
Seems race baiting sells magazines and drives ratings up. I hope none of the reporters or editors involved in this reporting never get into a scrape that makes the headlines.
In my own personal experience I’ve been there. My mother was involved in an automobile accident that killed two people. Overnight my mother became the “poster child” for why seniors shouldn’t drive. Overnight she was front page news and the way the reporting was worded my mother came across as a crazy old lady who should have lost her license years before. She went to her grave with that stigma attached to her name. I remember the reporters beating a path to her door trying to get “exclusive interviews” because I know those drive ratings up.
And don’t get me started with the professional race baiters who run off to every event where a mix of black and white is involved (as long as the black person can be perceived as a victim) and fan the flames even more.
What I’m trying to say here is don’t take at face value everything that is put in print or read on the six o’clock news. Rarely does the reporting report all sides of a story. There is an agenda and “facts” that support the agenda are brought to light. Anything that doesn’t fit the agenda is discarded on the cutting room floor.
Please note I didn’t point a finger at “the liberal press” or “the right wing” with my frustration here. Both ends of the spectrum are just as bad. It is doubtful that if the police officer in question has to go to trial that he’ll be able to even get a fair trial. Lately there’s been reporting in what I see as a blatant attempt to tar and feather him in the press.
Sad state of affairs if you ask me.
If we are ever to improve race relations in this country we need to stop harping on the differences and look at what is in common. As long as the press and other media get all hysterical about white vs. black, white vs. hispanic, black vs. hispanic, white vs. martian or whatever the Fergusons will continue to happen.